The petitions filed in Criminal Misc. Case 102/2015 and Criminal Misc. Appeal 463/2015 were dismissed as withdrawn upon counsel's application with liberty to raise all contentions as per arguments.
The petition and the application filed therewith are dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~15
POONAM MANCHANDA & ANR ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Rajat Aneja, Advocate with Ms. Chandrika Gupta, Advocate.
versus
ASHOK MANCHANDA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vikas Walia, Advocate for R1. Mr. Ashish Dutta, APP for the State with WSI Jaspreet, PS Rajinder Nagar.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA O R D E R % 20.07.2018
After some hearing the learned counsel for the petitioners, on instructions, submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition and the application filed therewith with liberty to raise all the contentions set out in the petition as arguments at the time of consideration of charge before the trial court.
The petition and the application filed therewith are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for granted.
R.K.GAUBA, J.
JULY 20, 2018 vk
Poonam Manchanda & Anr
Ashok Manchanda & Anr
R.K. Gauba
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
