Hardayal Sahoo v. State of NCT Delhi & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner moved to withdraw CRL.M.C. 1322/2016. Court allowed withdrawal by dismissing the petition as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
Petitioner moved to withdraw CRL.M.C. 1322/2016. Court allowed withdrawal by dismissing the petition as withdrawn.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
HARDAYAL SAHOO ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rahul Kumar Singh, Advocate along with petitioner in person.
versus
STATE OF NCT DELHI & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Mukesh Kumar, APP for the State with Insp. Praveen Kumar, Cyber Cell/Crime.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA O R D E R
% 19.07.2018
After some hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner, on instructions, submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
R.K.GAUBA, J.
JULY 19, 2018 vk
HARDAYAL SAHOO
STATE OF NCT DELHI
R.K. GAUBA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court