Rohit Kumar v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Single-judge bail application under Session Case where evidence was nearly completed for Section 302 IPC charge. Court held medical report did not justify bail as aid was available in jail. Petition dismissed.
What did the court decide?
Petition and accompanying application dismissed; bail not granted.
What the court decided
$~7
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + BAIL APPLN. 296/2018 & CRL.M.A. 2276/2018
ROHIT KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Inderjeet Sidhu, Adv. versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Ashish Dutta, APP for State. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA O R D E R % 19.07.2018
The medical report dated 19.05.2018 itself does not justify release of the petitioner on bail as is sought, the necessary medical aid and attention being accorded to him by the jail administration.
The charge against the accused is for the offence under Section 302 IPC, the case being at the stage of trial where evidence of the prosecution is on the verge of completion.
The petition and the accompanying application are dismissed.
R.K.GAUBA, J.
JULY 19, 2018 srb
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether medical report dated 19.05.2018 justifies release of petitioner on bail.
Whether petitioner can be released on bail when prosecution evidence is on the verge of completion in Section 302 IPC case.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
ROHIT KUMAR
- respondent
STATE
Coram
R.K.GAUBA
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court