Allowed

Jamal & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

Delhi HC10 Apr 2018W.P.(CRL)/1017/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Court allowed a petition to quash an FIR registered under Sections 308/34 IPC. The victims confirmed the dispute was settled amicably, and the court ordered the FIR and related proceedings to be quashed, directing petitioners to deposit costs.

What did the court decide?

FIR No.1242/2015, cross case FIR, and all proceedings therefrom were quashed. Petitioners directed to deposit ₹15,000 as costs in the Prime Minister Relief Fund.

Jamal & Ors. Vs State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors. — Cheque Dishonour | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~33

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(CRL) 1017/2018

¶4

JAMAL & ORS ..... Petitioners

¶5

Through : Ms.Roopa Nagpal, Advocate along with petitioners in person.

¶6

versus STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS ..... Respondents Through : Mr.Jamal Akhtar, proxy counsel for Mr.Rahul Mehra, Standing Counsel. SI Ompal Singh Rathi, PS Khajoori Khas. R2 to R4 in person.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG O R D E R

¶9

% 10.04.2018 CRL.M.A.No. 6317/2018 (Exemption)

¶10

Exemption allowed subject to all just exceptions.

¶11

The application stands disposed of.

¶12

W.P.(CRL) 1017/2018

¶13

Present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. for quashing of FIR No.1242/2015 registered under Sections 308/34 IPC at PS Khajuri Khas. It is stated that the matter has been settled amicably with the victims / respondents No.2 to 4 vide settlement deed dated 08.03.2018. Learned proxy counsel for the State informs that there are four accused persons i.e. petitioners. He further informs that there are three victims i.e. respondents No.2 to 4. Nature of injuries sustained by the victims is ‘simple’

¶14

Page 1 of 2

¶15

Victims / respondents No.2 to 4 are present in person and have been identified by the Investigating Officer. I have enquired from them if they have settled the dispute with the petitioners amicably without any fear or pressure. They have informed that all the disputes between the parties have been resolved amicably with their free consent and they have no objection to the quashing of the FIR in question.

¶16

The petition is supported by affidavits of the parties. Copy of settlement deed dated 08.03.2018 has been placed on record. Cross case registered vide FIR No.1241/2015 registered under Sections 308/34 IPC at PS Khajuri Khas has also been settled and the FIR therein has been quashed. Since the dispute between the parties has been settled, no useful purpose will be served to continue with the proceedings. In the interest of justice and to enable the parties to put an end to the litigation, FIR No.1242/2015 registered under Sections 308/34 IPC at PS Khajuri Khas and all the proceedings arising therefrom are quashed.

¶17

The petitioners are directed to deposit ` 15,000/- as costs in the Prime Minister Relief Fund within two weeks. Registry shall ensure its compliance.

¶18

The petition stands disposed of accordingly.

¶19

S.P.GARG, J

¶20

APRIL 10, 2018 / tr

¶21

Page 2 of 2

Jamal & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jamal & Ors. v. State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Krishan Chander Sharma Vs the State(Nct of Dlehi ) & Ors.

Mehmood Topiwala Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Himanshu @ Mannu & Anr. Vs the State NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Deepali Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Rohit @ Rohit Bhuttan & Anr. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Kailash Shankar & Ors. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Aarti Nishad @ Aarti Balkrishana & Anr. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Jyoti Ahirwar & Anr. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Narinder Singh Narang Vs State

Amit Kumar Vs State

M/S Harry & Sonia Salon Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Mansi Chadha Vs the State & Anr.

Saddam Hussain & Ors. Vs State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.