Amit Kumar v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
The court granted anticipatory bail to the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in a case involving IPC offences. The petitioner was directed to join the investigation as and when required and furnish a personal bond of Rs. 40,000 with one surety.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner admitted to anticipatory bail upon furnishing personal bond of Rs. 40,000 with one surety and joining the investigation as required.
What the court decided
$~5
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- BAIL APPLN. 236/2018
AMIT KUMAR
..... Petitioner
Through : Mr.Sunil Kapoor with Ms.Manu Bala, Advocates.
versus
STATE
..... Respondent
Through : Mr.Tarang Srivastava, APP. SI Avdesh, PS Vijay Vihar.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.P.GARG
%
O R D E R 09.04.2018
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to grant anticipatory bail under Section 438 Cr.P.C. in the present case.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Amit Kumar
- respondent
State
Coram
S.P. GARG
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court