Petitioner sought to withdraw the current petition and application with liberty to file a revision. The High Court of Delhi dismissed the impugned petition and application as withdrawn, granting the prayed liberty.
Permission granted to withdraw petition with liberty to file a revision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~37
Through: Mr. Shishir Singh and Mr. Rajiv Kr. Tomar, Advs.
versus
BISHAMBER DAYAL JOSHI ..... Respondent Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA O R D E R % 14.05.2018
After some hearing, the counsel for the petitioners submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition and the application filed therewith and instead be given liberty to file revision petition.
The petition and the application filed therewith are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for granted.
R.K.GAUBA, J.
MAY 14, 2018/ uj
Aney Pal Singh
Bishamber Dayal Joshi
R.K. Gauba
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
