The Civil Revisional Court disposed of a petition challenging a trial court decree, observing it should be raised in the appropriate appeal. The court expressed no opinion on merits and allowed liberty to plead contentions in the appeal.
Petition dismissed with liberty to urge contentions in the appeal against the judgment dated 3rd May, 2018.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
Through: Mr. S.N. Choudhari, Ms. Shruti Chaudhari & Mr. Sukreet Khandelwal, Advs.
versus
PARAMJEET KAUR ..... Respondent
Through: Ms. Zubeda Begu & Ms. Sana Ansari, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE J.R. MIDHA O R D E R
% 11.05.2018
J.R. MIDHA, J.
MAY 11, 2018 bh
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the challenged petition should be decided on merits or dismissed with liberty to raise contentions in the pending appeal.
Rajinder Chawla
Paramjeet Kaur
J.R. Midha
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
