Petitioner sought leave to withdraw petitions and applications, reserving right to press question of locus standi. High Court dismissed the petitions as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~35
versus
SWAMI SURNEDER DEV JI MAHARAJ ..... Respondent Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA O R D E R % 09.05.2018
After some hearing, the counsel for the petitioner submits that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition and the applications filed therewith, reserving the right to press the question of locus standi of the substituted plaintiff before the trial court.
The petition and the applications filed therewith are dismissed as withdrawn.
R.K.GAUBA, J.
MAY 09, 2018/ uj
Pro. M. Lal
Swami Surneder Dev Ji Maharaj
R.K. Gauba
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
