This order is a thin default disposal. The court allowed an advocate's application to withdraw his vakalatnama due to the petitioner's absence. Subsequently, it dismissed both the main petition and the compounding application in default of appearance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~7
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Abha Malhotra, Adv.for R-1. Mr. Jayendra, Adv. for R-2 & 3.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA O R D E R % 08.05.2018
The petition at hand was filed to assail the order dated 18.08.2010 of the Civil Judge on the file of execution case no. 90/2007 whereby the proceedings in the execution petition taken out by the petitioners with reference to order dated 24.08.2007 recorded on the file of civil suit (suit no. 179/2007) were closed, the observations recorded being that the petition was not maintainable.
The petition was presented through Mr. S.A. Khan, Advocate who has moved an application (CM No. 18802/2018) seeking permission to withdraw his vakalatnama. The application is accompanied by copy of a formal notice issued by him on 17.06.2017 to the first petitioner indicating his intention to do so and requiring his presence in the court on 09.08.2017 which was the date of hearing then fixed. No one has been appearing for the petitioners on the last three preceding dates. There is no appearance on CM(M) 1591/2010 page 1 of 2
page 1 of 2
behalf of the petitioners even today. The application of Mr. S.A. Khan, Advocate is allowed and he is discharged from his responsibility in the matter.
Since there is no one present on behalf of the petitioner on the matter being called out, the petition and the applications are dismissed in default.
R.K.GAUBA, J.
MAY 08, 2018 nk
CM(M) 1591/2010
page 2 of 2
Ram Bachan & Ors
Union of India & Ors
R.K. Gauba
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
