Petitioner sought to withdraw a petition and accompanying applications filed before this Court. The Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the matters.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~26
VINAY JAIN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Harshit Jain, Advocate along with petitioner in person.
versus
PEEPAL MAHADEV DHARMARTH TRUST (REGD) & ORS ..... Respondent
Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K.GAUBA O R D E R % 09.05.2018
After some hearing, the counsel for the petitioner submits, on instructions, that he may be allowed to withdraw the present petition and the applications filed therewith, petitioner reserving the right to raise the objections as to the authorization of the party which instituted the case during the trial.
The petition and the applications filed therewith are dismissed as withdrawn.
R.K.GAUBA, J.
MAY 09, 2018 vk
Vinay Jain
Peepal MahaDev Dharmarth Trust (Regd) & Ors
R.K.Gauba
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
