Petitioners sought permission to withdraw a petition during ongoing settlement negotiations. The High Court of Delhi granted liberty to withdraw as application dismissed.
Liberty to withdraw the petition with liberty to file afresh if settlement negotiations fail.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~8
GANGA PRASAD YADAV & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Ghanshyam Thakur, Advocate.
versus
FUTURE GENERALI INDIA INS CO LTD & ORS..... Respondents Through: None.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL O R D E R
% 12.11.2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that negotiations to settle the matter are under progress between the parties and for that reason he seeks permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to file afresh if the negotiation fails.
In view of the same, the petition and pending application are dismissed as withdrawn with such liberty.
VINOD GOEL, J.
“shailendra”
NOVEMBER 12, 2018
GANGA PRASAD YADAV & ORS
FUTURE GENERALI INDIA INS CO LTD & ORS
VINOD GOEL
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
