Petitioner applied for exemption to vacate property within one month. Court allowed exemption subject to undertaking via affidavit. Withdrawn stay application dismissed as withdrawn.
Exemption to vacate property within one month contingent on undertaking via affidavit.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~126
ASHOK KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Virender Singh, Advocate along with petitioner in person.
versus
PRAKASH CHANDER & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Nemo.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL
O R D E R % 12.11.2018
CM No. 46693/2018 (for exemption)
RC.REV. 521/2018 & CM No. 46692/2018 (for stay)
time given, the impugned order shall not be executable for one month from today.
VINOD GOEL, J.
NOVEMBER 12, 2018
“shailendra”
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to grant extension of time for petitioner to vacate property.
Whether to allow withdrawal of stay application.
Ashok Kumar
Prakash Chander & Ors.
Vinod Goel
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
