The petitioner sought exemption/stay orders. The High Court allowed such applications subject to exceptions. A separate composite application was dismissed as withdrawn due to a settlement between the parties.
Applications for exemption were allowed subject to exceptions; a separate petition regarding withdrawal was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~33/119
SHATRUGHAN GUPTA & ORS ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Visheshwar Srivastava, Adv.
versus
SHIVANI GUPTA ..... Respondent
Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD GOEL O R D E R % 13.11.2018
CM No. 47125/2018 (for exemption)
CM No.47124/2018 (for withdrawal of petition)
VINOD GOEL, J.
NOVEMBER 13, 2018
“shailendra”
Shatrughan Gupta & Ors
Shivani Gupta
Vinod Goel
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 227 of the Constitution invoking the High Court's supervisory jurisdiction over subordinate civil courts.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
