Bail petition withdrawn by petitioner who sought expedited trial despite being in custody for over a year; trial period noted as potentially lengthy.
Petitioner to be released from custody upon withdrawal of petition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~18
PAWAN @ BHURA
..... Petitioner
Through: Mr.Suraj Prakash Sharma, Adv.
versus
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)
..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for the State with SI P.L. Meena, P.S. Aman Vihar.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R % 02.08.2018
After some arguments, the learned counsel for the petitioner states that he would like to withdraw the petition. However, he submits that the petitioner is behind bars since 16.10.2016 and only 13 witnesses out of 23 have been examined so far. The case will take quite some time. Therefore, he requests that the trial may be expedited.
The learned counsel for the State submits that every endeavour will be made to have the same completed preferably within a year from today.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
NAJMI WAZIRI, J
AUGUST 02, 2018 /acm
Pawan @ Bhura
The State (NCT of Delhi)
Najmi Waziri
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
