Allowed

Ashiq Khan @ Vicky v. State

Delhi HC1 Aug 2018BAIL APPLN./1379/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under section 164 Cr.PC, the Court granted bail to the petitioner after the Additional Public Prosecutor confirmed that the complainant failed to support the allegations in her statement and subsequent evidence.

What did the court decide?

Petitioner granted bail on furnishing a personal bond of Rs.25,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court.

Ashiq Khan @ Vicky Vs State — Bail and Remand | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~22

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- BAIL APPLN. 1379/2018

¶4

ASHIQ KHAN @ VICKY ..... Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr. Yogesh Sharma and Mr. Mohd. Arif, Advocates.

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. G.M. Farooqui, APP for State with SI Pooja, PS-Vivek Vihar.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI

¶9

O R D E R

¶10

% 01.08.2018

¶11

According to the learned counsel for the petitioner, the complainant/victim had not supported the allegations either in her statement under section 164 Cr.PC or in her subsequent evidence as recorded on 31.07.2018.

¶12

The learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State states, upon instructions from the Investigating Officer that indeed it has so transpired yesterday.

¶13

In the aforesaid circumstances, the petitioner is granted bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety of the like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court concerned, subject to the following conditions:-

¶14

(i) the petitioner will regularly appear on each and every date of hearing

¶15

to be fixed by the Trial Court concerned;

¶16

(ii) the petitioner will not try to influence, contact or meet the complainant and prosecution witnesses in any manner;

¶17

(iii) the petitioner will not leave the country without prior permission of the Court and the passport, if any, shall be deposited with the Trial Court concerned; and

¶18

(iv) in case of change of his new address or contact number, the petitioner will promptly intimate to the SHO/IO of the case and intimate the Trial Court.

¶19

The petition stands disposed-off in the above terms.

¶20

Nothing stated in this order shall be deemed to be an adjudication on the merits of the case.

¶21

The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Jail Superintendent, concerned for compliance. Additionally, a copy of the same shall also be delivered upon the Jail Superintendent through police.

¶22

A copy of this order be given dasti to the learned counsel for the parties under the signature of the Court Master.

¶23

NAJMI WAZIRI, J

¶24

AUGUST 01, 2018 RW

Ashiq Khan @ Vicky v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ashiq Khan @ Vicky v. State

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohd Nasir Alam Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

M/S Uni Air Cargo Pvt.Ltd. Vs Commissioner of Police & Anr.

Preeti Vs the State & Ors.

Braham Singh & Anr. Vs State

Parveen Kumar & Ors. Vs State & Anr.

Vishal Jain & Ors. Vs the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.