Braham Singh & Anr. v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
A criminal revision petition challenging a conviction order under sections 323, 341, 506, and 34 IPC was dismissed as withdrawn by the High Court of Delhi.
What did the court decide?
The criminal revision petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
What the court decided
$~4
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CRL.REV.P. 522/2018 & Crl. M.A. No.11058/2018
BRAHAM SINGH & ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Ms. Sweety Chattopadhyay, Advocate.
Versus STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastava, Additional Public Prosecutor for State with SI Sohan Lal, P.S. Mehrauli.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI
O R D E R
- % 01.08.2018
This petition impugns an order dated 13.10.2017, whereby the order of conviction for the offences under sections 323/341/506/34 IPC against the petitioners has been upheld.
It is the petitioners’ case that there is a doubt about the situs of the incident i.e. whether it was inside the Arora Farm House or outside the Farm because the State contends that it was at the gate, whereas, according to Head Constable Subhash Chand (PW4), it was inside the Arora Farm House. Nevertheless, the Court would notice that the injured – Raju (PW2) and his wife – Dhanno (PW3) have deposed that they were assaulted and pushed around at the gate, which means the situs of the incident was the gate. This aspect has been adequately dealt with in the impugned order:-
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
BRAHAM SINGH
- respondent
STATE
Coram
NAJMI WAZIRI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court