Murtaza @ Mohit v. State
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application by Murtaza@Mohit in a case under POCSO and IPC. Court granted bail on personal bond secured by surety, subject to non-contact condition with the complainant.
What did the court decide?
Petitioner admitted to bail on personal bond with one surety for Rs.15,000 each, with condition not to contact the complainant.
What the court decided
$~2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- BAIL APPLN. 2579/2017
- MURTAZA @ MOHIT
..... Petitioner
- Through Mr. S.R. Kamat, Adv.
- versus
STATE
..... Respondent Through Mr.Kewal Singh Ahuja, APP for the State along with SI Kayal.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR
O R D E R
% 03.01.2018
The petitioner is stated to be in custody since 01.08.2017. FIR No.443/2017 had been registered at Police Station Nihal Vihar on the complaint of one ‘R’, aged 16 years.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Murtaza @ Mohit
- respondent
State
Coram
Indermeet Kaur
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court