Quashed

Azad v. the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi HC3 Jan 2018W.P.(CRL)/8/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this writ petition, the petitioner sought quashing of an FIR due to a settlement reached with his sister, the complainant, regarding a property dispute. The High Court ordered the quashing of FIR No.289/2017 under IPC sections 420/468/471/120B, citing the inter se arrangement and relationship between parties.

What did the court decide?

FIR No.289/2017 and all proceedings therefrom were quashed.

Azad Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr. — Cheating and Forgery | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~12

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(CRL) 8/2018 AZAD

¶4

..... Petitioner

¶5

Through Mr.Mohan Kumar Sharma, Adv.

¶6

versus

¶7

THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR

¶8

		..... Respond	ents
Through	Mr.Rajesh Mahajan	, ASC with	Mr.
	Mohit Sharma, Adv.	for State.
	Mr.Natwar Rai,	Advocate	for
	complainant.

¶9

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

% 03.01.2018

¶12

The present FIR i.e. FIR No.289/2017 has been registered under Sections 420/468/471/120B of the IPC at police station K.M.Pur on the complaint of Savitri Devi.

¶13

This Court notes that the complainant is the sister of the petitioner. The dispute was inter se brother and sister qua an alternative plot allotted to the petitioner pursuant to the acquisition of their land. The petitioner represented himself to be the sole legal heir of late Ram Swaroop (father of the parties); the name of his sister was not disclosed by him. Parties have now arrived at a settlement. A memorandum of understanding has been entered into between the parties on 18.12.2017 wherein the petitioner has paid a sum of Rs.21,00,000/- in full and final settlement of the claim of his sister.

¶14

Parties having arrived at a settlement, the petitioner prays that the present FIR proceedings be quashed. In the interest of justice and noting the inter se arrangement arrived at between the parties as also the relationship between the parties, this is a fit case where the FIR should be quashed. Accordingly, FIR No.289/2017 registered under Sections 420/468/471/120B of the IPC at Police Station K.M.Pur and all proceedings emanating therefrom stand quashed.

¶15

Petition disposed of.

¶16

INDERMEET KAUR, J

¶17

JANUARY 03, 2018 ndn

Azad v. the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Azad v. the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gyan Chand @ Gyani & Ors. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Omveer Sharma & Anr. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Lokesh Sharma & Ors. Vs State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Rakesh Singh & Anr. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Deepak & Ors. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Rohanneet Singh Raina Vs State & Ors.

Ram Prasad Vs State & Anr.

Sanjay Gambhir Vs State NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Sh. Dharmender and Ors. Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Mr. Raghunandan Shanker Mathur and Anr. Vs General Manager, Reserve Bank of India and Ors.

Ms. Asmita Atrey and Ors. Vs Amity University through Its Vice Chancellor

Satish Chand Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Gurmeet Singh Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi

MD Zilani & Anr. Vs State of NCT of Delhi