Quashed

Satish Chand v. the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi HC3 Jan 2018W.P.(CRL)/2/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Delhi, in W.P.(CRL) 2/2018, allowed the petitioner's request to quash FIR No.639/2014. The Court noted that parties had reached a full and final settlement endorsed by the complainant at the Delhi Mediation Centre. The Court held that continuing proceedings would be futile and a wastage of time.

What did the court decide?

FIR No.639/2014 registered at police station Harsh Vihar and all proceedings emanating therefrom are quashed.

Satish Chand Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr. — Quashing and FIR | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

$~10

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(CRL) 2/2018 SATISH CHAND

¶4

..... Petitioner Through Mr.Ashok Kumar Tiwari, Advocate with petitioner in person.

¶5

versus

¶6

THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR

¶7

Ms.Nandita Rao,	..... ASC	Respond for GNC	ents TD
with Mr.Samrat	Khat	yal with	SI
Harsh Vihar.
Mr.Ashok Tha	gal,	Adv.	for
complainant.

¶8

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE INDERMEET KAUR

¶9

O R D E R % 03.01.2018

¶10

C.M. No.17/2018 (exemption)

¶11

Exemption is allowed subject to just exceptions. Application disposed of.

¶12

W.P.(CRL) 2/2018

¶13

This petition has been filed seeking quashing of FIR No.639/2014 registered under Sections 419/420/468/471/120B/34 of the IPC at police station Harsh Vihar. The complainant is Suresh Ram Gupta. This Court has been informed that the parties have entered into a settlement and the earnest money which had been paid by the complainant to the petitioner has since been returned back.

¶14

The complainant is present in Court. He is duly represented by his counsel. He endorses this settlement. The complainant has received a total sum of Rs.3,65,000/- which is the full and final settlement entered into between the parties before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi. The settlement agreement dated 17.10.2017 executed before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi is a part of the record. Petitioner is accordingly seeking quashing of the FIR.

¶15

In the interest of justice and noting the inter se settlement arrived at between the parties which has been endorsed by the complainant, this Court is of the view that no fruitful purpose would be served in continuing these proceedings any further; it would be a wastage of the precious time of the Court as the end result would be a result in futility. Accordingly, FIR No.639/2014 registered under Sections 419/420/468/471/120B/34 of the IPC at police station Harsh Vihar and all proceedings emanating therefrom stand quashed.

¶16

Petition disposed of.

¶17

Order dasti.

¶18

INDERMEET KAUR, J

¶19

JANUARY 03, 2018 ndn

Satish Chand v. the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satish Chand v. the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gyan Chand @ Gyani & Ors. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Omveer Sharma & Anr. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Lokesh Sharma & Ors. Vs State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.

Rakesh Singh & Anr. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Deepak & Ors. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Rohanneet Singh Raina Vs State & Ors.

Ram Prasad Vs State & Anr.

Sanjay Gambhir Vs State NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Sh. Dharmender and Ors. Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Mr. Raghunandan Shanker Mathur and Anr. Vs General Manager, Reserve Bank of India and Ors.

Ms. Asmita Atrey and Ors. Vs Amity University through Its Vice Chancellor

Azad Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Gurmeet Singh Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi

MD Zilani & Anr. Vs State of NCT of Delhi