In a written petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, petitioners directed respondents (Bank Board) to decide a representation within one week and dispose of the writ proceedings.
Petition disposed. Direction to respondents to decide the representation dated 10.09.2018 within one week.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
RATNESH KUMAR & ORS
..... Petitioners
Through Ms. Swathi Sukumar, Ms. Surya Rajappan and Mr. Naveen Nagarjuna, Advs.
versus
BOARD OF DIRECTORS, DENA BANK & ORS
..... Respondents
Through
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
O R D E R % 15.11.2018
After some arguments, it is agreed by counsel for the petitioners that let the respondents dispose of the representation dated 10.09.2018 filed by the petitioners.
Accordingly, I hereby dispose of the present petition while directing the respondents to decide the representation dated 10.09.2018 filed by the petitioners within one week from today.
Petition is disposed of.
Order dasti under signatures of Court Master.
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J
NOVEMBER 15, 2018 gb
RATNESH KUMAR & ORS
BOARD OF DIRECTORS, DENA BANK & ORS
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
