Petitioner sought permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh. Permission was granted, and the writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to file afresh was granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~50
versus
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION AND ANR.
..... Respondents Through: None.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT O R D E R % 14.11.2018
After hearing some arguments, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to file afresh. Permission, as sought, is granted.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, J
NOVEMBER 14, 2018 rd
SITARAM MISHRA
CENTRAL INFORMATION COMMISSION
SURESH KUMAR KAIT
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
