Writ petition regarding anti-dumping duty duty challenge withdrawn as the underlying notification was withdrawn, rendering the petition infructuous; petition dismissed as withdrawn. No relief required./
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12
RENEW SOLAR POWER PVT.LTD. ..... Petitioner
Through Mr.Sujit Ghose, Ms.Mannat and Mr. Rishabh Prasad, Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr.Anurag Ahluwalia, CGSC for UOI.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE A. K. CHAWLA
It is stated that the notification, which was the subject matter of challenge in these proceedings, regarding imposition of anti-dumping duty has been withdrawn. It is stated that in the circumstance, the petition has become infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks liberty to withdraw this petition and to avail remedy available to him in case a fresh cause of action arises.
Writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J
A. K. CHAWLA, J
MAY 03, 2018/ ndn
RENEW SOLAR POWER PVT. LTD.
UNION OF INDIA
S. Ravindra Bhat
A. K. Chawla
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
