The petitioner sought withdrawal of the writ petition with liberty to file fresh ones. The Court granted permission to withdraw with liberty to file fresh petition.
Petition and application dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file fresh petition if occasion arises.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~29
VEEAR ENTERPRISES ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. H.K.Gangwani, Advocate
Versus
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Keshav Mohan & Mr. Piyush Choudhary, Advocates
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
O R D E R
% 05.12.2018
Taken up on mentioning.
Learned counsel for petitioner seeks permission of the Court to withdraw this petition with permission to file fresh petition, if the occasion arises.
In view of aforesaid, this petition and application are accordingly dismissed as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed for.
SUNIL GAUR, J
DECEMBER 05, 2018
r
Page | 1
VEEAR ENTERPRISES
EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANISATION & ORS.
Sunil Gaur
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
