The petition in WP(C) 7666/2018 was allowed subject to exceptions. The petitioner was granted liberty to file a representation for a visa to visit family in India.
Petitioner allowed to make a representation for visa to visit families in India; concerned Authority to decide.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~41
TAUFIQ AHMED ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Tarranjit Singh Sawhney, Adv.
versus
THE UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.Sanjeev Narula, CGSC with Mr.R.M. Tripathi, GP & Mr.Rajat Gava, Adv. for UOI.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R
% 01.10.2018
C.M. No.29394-95/2018
W.P.(C) 7666/2018 & CM No. 29393/2018
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
OCTOBER 01, 2018 ab
TAUFIQ AHMED
THE UNION OF INDIA
VIBHU BAKHRU
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
