Hon'ble Court granted petitioner's application to withdraw the writ petition. The respondent undertook to examine the petitioner's regularisation application within eight weeks.
Petitioner granted leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to assail any action taken by the respondent regarding the regularisation application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~41
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PREM SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Sumit Bansal, Advocate with Mr. Prateek Kohli, Mr. Udaibir Singh Kochar and Mr. Ankit Banati, Advocates.
versus
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORRPORATION ..... Respondent
Through: Mr. Rakesh Mittal, Standing Counsel for SDMC with Mr. Kamlesh Anand and Ms. Yamini Mittal, Advocates. Mr. Anil Kaushik, Advocate with Mr. Akash Bhardwaj and Mr. Pavit Singh, Advocates for applicant.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL O R D E R
% 03.10.2018
Mr. Sumit Bansal, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw this petition at this stage, with liberty to assail the order that may be passed by the South Delhi Municipal Corporation, in relation to his application seeking regularisation of the construction existing in the subject property i.e. Khasra No. 253 behind South Delhi Municipal Corporation, Primary
School, near Kohinoor, Farm House Saidulajab, New Delhi in the event, he is aggrieved thereby.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of South Delhi Municipal Corporation states that, subject to the petitioner furnishing all the requisite details, they shall determine his application seeking regularisation as aforestated strictly, in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from today.
Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the South Delhi Municipal Corporation further states that, in the event the construction existing in the subject property is contrary to law, they shall take appropriate action, in accordance with law, against the same thereafter. The petitioner is granted leave to withdraw this petition, at this stage, while reserving liberty to him to assail any action that may be taken on behalf of the South Delhi Municipal Corporation, in relation to the regularisation application filed by the petitioner in appropriate proceedings and, in accordance with law.
The petition stands disposed of accordingly. Pending applications also stand disposed of.
SIDDHARTH MRIDUL, J
OCTOBER 03, 2018 p’ma
Prem Singh
South Delhi Municipal Corporation
Siddharth Mridul
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
