The single-judge bench disposed of a writ petition after the petitioner's lawyer tendered an apology for an affidavit error. The respondent was warned to be careful in future.
unconditional apology for inaccurate affidavit was accepted
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~6
SUSHIL KUMAR ..... Petitioner
Through Mr.Surender Chauhan, Adv.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through Mr.Rakesh Kumar Singh, Adv. for R- 4.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % 01.10.2018
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
OCTOBER 01, 2018 ab
SUSHIL KUMAR
UNION OF INDIA
VIBHU BAKHRU
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
