The Hon'ble court dismissed two writ petitions, holding that the impugned orders were identical to those considered in W.P.(C) 6539/2018 (Laxman Dass) and other connected matters which had already been decided against the petitioners.
The present petitions are dismissed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified Signed By:RAM DATT Signing Date:15.10.2024 16:42 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file an d no page is missing.
Advocates for respondent.
WITH + W.P.(C) 7310/2018 & CM No. 27889/2018
SANJAY KUMAR Petitioner
Through: Mr Kamlesh Kumar Mishra, Ms Mahima Rathi and Mr Sanjay Baniwal, Advocates.
versus
| DELHI URBAN AND ORS. |
SHELTER I | MPROVEMENT BOARD Respo |
ndents |
|---|---|---|---|
| Through: | .Mr Abhay Prakash Sahay, C R-2. |
GSC for | |
| Ms Mini Pushkarna, |
Standing | ||
| Counsel for DUSIB, Ms |
Swagata | ||
| Bhuyan and Ms Shiva Advocates for respondent.- |
Pandey, | ||
| Md. Irshad with Mr Prems |
agar Pal |
||
| and Mr Vikas Saini, Advocat 3/GNCTD. |
es for R- |
| + W.P.(C) 7312 |
A /2018 & CM N |
ND o. 27892/2018 |
|||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| REEMA | P | etition | er | ||
| Through: | Mr Kamlesh Mahima Rath Baniwal, Advoc |
Kumar i and ates. |
Mish Mr |
ra, Ms Sanjay |
|
| versus |
DELHI URBAN SHELTER IMPROVEMENT BOARD AND ORS. Respondents Through: Mr Abhay Prakash Sahay, CGSC for R-2.
Ms Mini Pushkarna, Standing Counsel for. DUSIB, Ms Swagata Bhuyan and Ms Shiva Pandey, Advocates for respondent.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
ORDER % 17.07.2018
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
JULY 17, 2018 MK
1 issue framed by the court
Whether present petitions are maintainable given identical impugned orders covered in prior judgments.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Laxman Dass v. Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board and Ors.Followed¶1
W.P.(C) 6539/2018
Sanjay Kumar
Reema
Delhi Urban Shelter Improvement Board
Laxman Dass
Vibhu Bakhru
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
