The court dismissed the petition as infructuous because the impugned FPS authorisation had been cancelled in another petition.
Petition dismissed as infructuous; pending application disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~23
M/S VED PARKASH AND ORS. ..... Petitioners
Through Mr Pardeep Gupta, Mr Parinav Gupta, Ms Mansi Gupta, Mr Moazzam Ali, Mr Wazir Malik, Advocates. versus GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through Mr Raman Singh, Stanidng Counsel for GNCTD with Mr Chirayu Jain, Advocate in item Nos.23. Mr Shadan Farasat, ASC wit Mr Ahmed Sai, Advocate for Respondents. Mr Naushad Ahmad Khan, ASC (Civil) GNCTD with Ms Sana Naseem, Advocate for Respondent No. 2. Mr Rishikesh Kumar, ASC with Mr Premsagar Pal, Advocates for GNCTD. Mr Raman Singh, Stanidng Counsel for GNCTD with Mr Chirayu Jain, Advocate in item Nos. 23. Mr Shadan Farasat, ASC wit Mr Ahmed Sai, Advocate for Respondents. Mr Naushad Ahmad Khan, ASC (Civil) GNCTD with Ms Sana Naseem, Advocate for Respondent No. 2. Mr Rishikesh Kumar, ASC with Mr Premsagar Pal, Advocates for GNCTD.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % 16.07.2018
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
JULY 16, 2018 pkv
M/S VED PARKASH AND ORS.
GOVERNMENT OF NCT OF DELHI AND ORS.
VIBHU BAKHRU
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
