Petitions dismissed in default for non-prosecution; claim that principal of respondent No. 4 was removed as of April 30, 2018, suggesting petition does not survive.
None; petitions dismissed in default for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Signature Not Verified Signing Date:14.10.2024 17:03:10 Certify that the digital and physical file have been compared and the digital data is as per the physical file an d no page is missing.
W.P.(C) 9705/2016 & 691/2017
Clearly, the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting this petition which is accordingly dismissed in default for non-prosecution. Besides, insofar as W.P.(C) 9705/20 16 is concerned, the order dated21st October, 2016 limited the said petition to prayer (b) therein, which was for removal of principal of respondent No. 4, Ms. Aabha Maihotra, learned counsel appearing for respondent No. 4 submits that the Principal has already been removed as on30th April, 2018 and that as such this writ petition does not survive for consideration.
Be that as it may, these writ petitions are dismissed in default and for non-prosecution.
DECEMBER 06, 2018
rd
Page2of2
W.P.(C) 9705/2016 & 691/2017
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
