The High Court of Delhi dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn after the petitioner sought leave to withdraw, stating that the relief sought had been substantially granted. Liberty to file further grievances was reserved.
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn; liberty reserved for future grievances.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~21
CARDIFF ASSOCIATES PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Jasmeet Singh with Mr. Aditya Madaan, Advocate
versus
NORTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION..... Respondent Through: Ms. Puja Kalra, Advocate for NDMC
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
Mr. Jasmeet Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the writ petition as the relief in the writ petition stands substantially granted.
The writ petition is, accordingly, dismissed as withdrawn. However, on the request of Mr. Jasmeet Singh, the liberty stands reserved to the petitioner should any grievance again survive.
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
DECEMBER 06, 2018 rd
Cardiff Associates Pvt. Ltd.
North Delhi Municipal Corporation
C. Hari Shankar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
