The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the writ petition. The court granted leave and dismissed the petition as withdrawn.
Petitioner granted leave to withdraw the writ petition; petition dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9
MUSKAN SAMJIIK EVAN ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rudro Chatterjee, Advocate
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Monika Arora, CGSC with Mr.Kushal Kumar, Advocate for UOI Mr. T. Singhdev, Ms. Puja Sarkar, Ms. Michelle B. Das & Mr. Abhijit Chakravarty, Advocates for MCI
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
C.HARI SHANKAR, J
DECEMBER 05, 2018 rd
MUSKAN SAMJIIK EVAN
UNION OF INDIA & ANR
C. HARI SHANKAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
