This order states that the petitioner's grievance regarding a passport has been addressed as the passport was returned. The Court declined to impose costs on the respondent and disposed of the writ petition.
Petition disposed of; costs of the petition declined.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11
SAURABH SHARMA ..... Petitioner
Through Mr Sanam Nagrath Kohli, Mr Brchana Sharma, Advocates.
versus
THE ADDITIONAL COMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS ..... Respondent Through Mr Satish Aggarwala, Mr Vineet Sharma, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % 14.08.2018
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
AUGUST 14, 2018 pkv
SAURABH SHARMA
THE ADDITIONAL COMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS
VIBHU BAKHRU
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
