A petition challenging the constitutional validity of Sections 164 and 167 of the Companies Act, 2013 was dismissed as withdrawn by the Court.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge the constitutional validity of Sections 164 and 167 of the Companies Act, 2013.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~9
GAURAV KHULLAR AND ORS. ..... Petitioners
Through: Mr Karanveer Jindal, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mrs Bharathi Raju, CGSC, Advocate for R-1 & R-2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R
% 14.08.2018
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
AUGUST 14, 2018 MK
Gaurav Khullar and Ors.
Union of India and Ors.
Vibhu Bakhu
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
