Writ petition disposed of. Petitioner conceded that prayer clauses (a)–(c) were not pressed due to a new policy. Liberty granted to approach civil court for relief under clause (d). Pending application closed.
Petitioner granted liberty to approach civil court for clause (d); writ petition disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~11
HT MEDIA LTD AND ANR ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Nakul Sachdeva with Mr. Ankit Rajgarhia, Advs.
versus
DIRECTORATE OF ADVERTISING AND VISUAL PUBLICITY AND ANR ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC.
CORAM:
% 24.05.2018
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
MAY 24, 2018 /pmc
HT MEDIA LTD AND ANR
DIRECTORATE OF ADVERTISING AND VISUAL PUBLICITY AND ANR
Rajiv Shakdher
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
