Order allowing withdrawal of W.P.(C) 1708/2018 via CM application 21855/2018 and dismissing the writ petition as withdrawn. The petitioner sought permission to withdraw, which was not opposed and was granted.
Permission to withdraw the writ petition was granted; the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~54
YATIN GHAI ..... Petitioner
Through: Ms. Ritu Yadav with Ms. Amrita Mishra, Advs
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Vivek Goyal, CGSC with Mr. Harsh Pandit, Adv for R1
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
O R D E R % 23.05.2018
CM. APPL. 21855/2018
W.P.(C) 1708/2018
RAJIV SHAKDHER, J
MAY 23, 2018 c
YATIN GHAI
UNION OF INDIA
RAJIV SHAKDHER
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
