Aura Foundation v. Rehabilitation Council of India
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner withdrew the pending writ petition; permitted and dismissed as withdrawn.
What did the court decide?
Petition and applications dismissed as withdrawn.
Petitioner withdrew the pending writ petition; permitted and dismissed as withdrawn.
Petition and applications dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~12
AURA FOUNDATION ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Sanjay Sharawat with Mr.Divyank Rana, Advs.
versus
REHABILITATION COUNCIL OF INDIA ..... Respondent Through: Ms.Anuja Saxena, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI
O R D E R % 05.04.2018
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he has instructions to withdraw the present petition.
As prayed, the petition as well as applications are dismissed as withdrawn.
REKHA PALLI, J
APRIL 05, 2018
gm
Aura Foundation
Rehabilitation Council of India
Rekha Palli
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court