The petitioner, appearing in person, sought permission to withdraw the election petition during the counting phase. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with liberty to resume litigation later.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to resume at a later stage.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~38
SHUBHAM GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through Petitioner in person.
versus
RETURNING OFFICER AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through Ms.Amandeep Kaur, Adv. with Mr.Tarun Verma, Adv., Ms.Puja Sarkar, Adv. & Ms.Michelle, Adv. for R-1 & 2. Mr.Preet Pal Singh, Adv. for BCI.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI
The petitioner, who appears in person, submits that in view of the fact that the election process is still going on and the counting is underway, he seeks leave to withdraw the present petition with liberty to take appropriate steps at a later stage, if so advised.
The petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed
for.
APRIL 04, 2018/aa
REKHA PALLI, J
Shubham Gupta
Returning Officer
Rekha Palli
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
