This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
SHAKTI CHAWLA
..... Appellant
Through Mr. M. Padhi, Advocate
versus
VIJAINDER KUMAR & ANR ..... Respondents Through Ms. K.B. Hina, Advocate for respondents with respondent no. 2 in person.
CORAM:
SH. PARVEEN KUMAR UPPAL, REGISTRAR O R D E R % 31.01.2020
Reply to the main appeal has been filed on behalf of respondents. Rejoinder to the same has also been filed.
The case is already admit vide order dated 22.01.2019.
List the matter in the category of “Regular Matters” in due course.
REGISTRAR
JANUARY 31, 2020/ sk
SHAKTI CHAWLA
VIJAINDER KUMAR
SH. PARVEEN KUMAR UPPAL, REGISTRAR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
