Simples writ order regarding delayed interview letters for Career Advancement Scheme applications by Assistant Professors.
Respondent to convey fate of applications within two weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~32
DR. VINEET KUMAR AND ORS. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Sarvesh Bisaria, Mr. Anand Prakash & Mr. Prakash Chandra Sharma, Advocates
Versus
NETAJI SUBHASH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Palak Rohmetra, Advocate for Nr, Avnish Ahlawat, Advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. Devesh Singh, ASC for respondent No.2GNCTD
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
O R D E R % 03.01.2018
Petitioners are Assistant Professors with respondent No.1- Institute, who vide applications (Annexure-11) had applied under the Career Advancement Scheme in pursuance to Circular of 14th September, 2017 (Annexure-10) .
Learned counsel for petitioner submits that till date petitioners have not received the interview letters whereas similarly placed persons have already received interview letters.
Since petitioners had applied well in time, therefore, they are
W.P.(C) 17/2018
Page 1
entitled to know by when will they get the interview calls and if not, why?
Learned counsel for first respondent submits that fate of petitioners’ applications would be conveyed to petitioners within two weeks from today.
Let it be so done.
This petition and applications are disposed of with liberty to petitioners to avail of the remedies, as available in law, if need be.
A copy of this order be given dasti under the signatures of Court Master to counsel for the parties.
SUNIL GAUR, J
JANUARY 03, 2018
r
W.P.(C) 17/2018
Page 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether petitioners Assistant Professors are entitled to know the timeline for Career Advancement Scheme interviews.
DR. VINEET KUMAR AND ORS.
NETAJI SUBHASH INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
SUNIL GAUR
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
