Dismissed
Gokal Chand Mittal v. U.O.I. & Anr.
Delhi HCW.P.(C)/5375/2014
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Writ petition dismissed as withdrawn by the court.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~8
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- W.P.(C) 5375/2014 and CM No. 10702/2014 GOKAL CHAND MITTAL ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Manish Makhija, Advocates.
¶4
versus
¶5
U.O.I. & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Sanjeev Narula, CGSC. Ms Mala Narayan and Ms Neha Dawar, Advocates for R-2/IOCL. Mr Dhanesh Relan and Ms Anshita Manocha, Advocates for DDA. Mr Avneesh Garg, Mr P. Sinha and Mr M.P. Singh, Advocates for BPCL.
¶6
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R
¶7
% 05.01.2018
¶8
- After some arguments, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition.
¶9
- The petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
¶10
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
¶11
JANUARY 05, 2018 RK
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Gokal Chand Mittal
- respondent
U.O.I.
- respondent
I.O.C.L.
- respondent
DDA
- respondent
BPCL
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court