Amarjeet & Ors. v. Union of India & Ors.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioners submitted that their grievance was satisfied and do not press the writ petition. The court dismissed the petition as not pressed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~17
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Yeeshu Jain, Standing Counsel for L&B/LAC with Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate. Ms.Mrinalini Sen and Ms.Kritika Gupta, Advocates for DDA.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
O R D E R % 09.05.2018
Counsel for the petitioners on instructions submits that the grievance of the petitioners stands satisfied. He further submits that he does not press the writ petition. Accordingly, the same is dismissed as not pressed.
G. S. SISTANI, J
SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J
MAY 09, 2018 afa
Amarjeet & Ors.
Union of India & Ors.
G.S. Sistani
Sangita Dhingra Sehgal
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court