The High Court of Delhi disposed of this writ petition regarding a street vendor's request to hawk at Anand Vihar Bus Stand after directing that he make a representation to MCD/TVC for expedited consideration.
The writ petition was disposed of as prayed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
PAPPU ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Kamlesh Kr. Mishra and Mr Sanjay Baniwal, Advs
versus
EAST DELHI MUNICIPAL CORORATION AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Ranjan Tyagi, Adv for EDMC with ASI Prakash
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE G.S.SISTANI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL
O R D E R
% 09.05.2018
The petitioner claims to be hawking at the Anand Vihar Bus Stand area U.P. side at Delhi and selling chola kulcha and parantha. Under the threat of removal from the site has led to the filing of the present writ petition.
Mr Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that almost 200 vendors have been allowed to vend at an area across the road while the stand of the MCD is that the present area is a no hawking no vending area. Mr Mishra also submits that the area where the petitioner claims to be vending is comparable to the area across the road in view of the fact that there is a road, pavement, service lane, another pavement and then PWD road.
Learned counsel for respondent No. 1 submits that the Anand
Vihar Bus Stand area U.P. side has been kept completely free of street vendors . A photograph of the area has been handed over in Court in support of his submission along with status report (let the status report be filed in the registry).
The learned counsel for the petitioner, at this stage, submits that he wishes to withdraw this petition as he would make a representation to the MCD and / or the TVC to seek appropriate direction to enable him to vend in the area in question. We have no hesitation in saying that as soon as the representation is made, the same shall be decided expeditiously in accordance with law.
With this direction, the writ petition and CM No. 16377/2018 are disposed of, as prayed.
G.S.SISTANI, J
SANGITA DHINGRA SEHGAL, J
MAY 09, 2018 SU
page 2 of 2
W.P.(C) 4171/2018
Pappu
East Delhi Municipal Corporation
G.S. Sistani
Sangita Dhingra Sehgal
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
