Allowed

Sachin Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.

Delhi HC2 Aug 2018W.P.(C)/5065/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner withdrew the writ petition regarding posting order. Court granted leave to withdraw, accepted undertakings not to challenge subsequent orders, vacated interim stay, and directed petitioner to report to posting within ten days. Petition disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Leave to withdraw petition granted. Interim order vacated. Directing petitioner to report to posting within ten days. Undertakings accepted regarding future legal challenges.

Sachin Kumar Vs Union of India & Ors. — Service and Employment | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

.$~3

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(C) 5065/2018 & C.M. No.19515/2018 (for stay)

¶4

SACHIN KUMAR ..... Petitioner Through Mr.Ankur Chhibber, Adv. with petitioner in person.

¶5

versus

¶6

UNION OF INDIA & ORS ..... Respondents Through Ms.Maninder Acharya, ASG with Mr.Mahender Kumar Bhardwaj, Adv., Ms.Saakshi Agrawal, Adv., Ms.Vinita Ashutosh, Adv.

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI

¶8

O R D E R

¶9

% 02.08.2018

¶10

On 29^th May, 2018, learned counsel for the respondents had sought time to obtain instructions from Director (Medical) to whom the petitioner had handed over letter dated 13.04.2018, through the ADG (HQ) for reconsidering his posting order.

¶11

Today, Ms.Maninder Acharya, learned Additional Solicitor General, submits that the present petition is a case of gross abuse of the process of the Court as the petitioner has withheld material information. She hands over the original file relating to representations submitted by the petitioner against his transfer to Sector Headquarter, Tejpur from Base Hospital, Delhi in terms of W.P.(C) 5065/2018 Page No.1 of 2

¶12

the impugned order dated 12.04.2018, which has been perused. The same had also been shared with learned counsel for the petitioner in the pre-lunch session. Upon perusal thereof, learned counsel for the petitioner had sought time to obtain instructions from his client who is present in Court.

¶13

In the post-lunch session, learned counsel for the petitioner states on instructions that he does not wish to press this petition and may be permitted to withdraw the same. Leave as prayed for is granted.

¶14

The petitioner undertakes not to challenge the order dated 27.04.2018 posting him to 10th Bn, Kimin. It is made clear that the petitioner shall not be entitled to take any of the pleas taken in the present petition before any other legal forum for quashing of the order dated 27.04.2018, whereby his request for retaining him in Delhi had been rejected by the respondents or for quashing his transfer order dated 4.05.2018 or the subsequent posting order dated 04.05.2018.

¶15

The interim order stands vacated. The petitioner shall report to his place of posting within ten days from today.

¶16

The petition is disposed of along with pending application.

¶17

HIMA KOHLI, J

¶18

REKHA PALLI, J

¶19

AUGUST 02, 2018/aa

¶20

Page No.2 of 2

¶21

W.P.(C) 5065/2018

Sachin Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sachin Kumar v. Union of India & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt. Chaitali Vasoo Vs Union of India and Ors.

Jagran Prakashan Ltd. Vs Jyoti Dhamija

Jagran Prakashan Ltd. Vs Abhishek Rawat

Jagran Prakashan Limited Vs Dhananjay Kumar

M/S Indo Crystal Pvt. Ltd. Vs Directorate of Enforcement

Court on Its Own Motion Vs Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.

Ex. Cadet Abhilash Yadav. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Rajiv Khanna Vs University of Delhi and Ors.

Dr. Vivek Kumar Mathur Vs Union of India and Ors.

Col a. K. Mor Vs Union of India and Ors.

Md. Azad Uddin Vs Union of India and Anr.

Ct/Gd Parul Tyagi Vs Union of India & Ors.

Union of India and Ors. Vs Shri S. P. Singh

Prahalad Singh Vs Union of India & Ors.