A single-line order dismissing a writ petition as withdrawn after the petitioner counsel stated that the dispute between the parties had been settled. The pending application was also disposed of.
The writ petition was dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
M/S AMBICA TRADEXPO PRIVATE LTD. THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR- VIKAS VASUDEVA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Rahul Dubey, proxy for Mr Devender Hora, Advocates.
versus
M/S KOTAK MAHINDRA PRIME LTD. ..... Respondent Through Mr Vikas Chopra, Advocate.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R
% 12.07.2018
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
JULY 12, 2018 MK
M/S Ambica Tradexpo Private Ltd.
M/S Kotak Mahindra Prime Ltd.
Vibhu Bakhru
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
