The petitioner sought to withdraw a writ petition with liberty to challenge the Specified Bank Notes (Cessation of Liabilities) Act, 2016.
Petition dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to challenge the Specified Bank Notes (Cessation of Liabilities) Act, 2016.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~2
SH. N.S. PARIHAR ..... Petitioner
Through Mr Bharat Bhushan, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through Mr Prasanta Varma, Senior Central Govt. Counsel with Ms Shalu Goswami, Advocate for Respondent No. 1. Mr H.S. Parihar, Mr K.S. Parihar, Advocates for Respondent No. 2/RBI.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU O R D E R % 11.07.2018
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
JULY 11, 2018 pkv
Sh. N.S. Parihar
Union of India
Vibhu Bakhu
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
