The Court granted leave to withdraw a writ petition seeking interim protection in a debt recovery matter before the DRT, disposing of the petition along with pending applications.
Leave to withdraw the petition granted; petition disposed of as withdrawn along with pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~26 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SONU GROVER AND ANR. ..... Petitioners Through: Mr.Sanjeev Bhandari, Advocate with Mr.Ravi Data, Mr.Rajesh Sharma & Mr.Prateek Kumar, Advocates
versus
ALLAHABAD BANK ..... Respondent Through: None
CORAM:
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE HIMA KOHLI HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE PRATIBHA RANI
O R D E R % 23.03.2018
learned DRAT while issuing notice in Appeal No.104/2018 [Arising out of O.A. No.348/2014] on 13.03.2018, and further re-notifying the matter on 20.03.2018 to 20.04.2018, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the present petition while reserving the right of his clients to seek legal recourse, in terms of the interim relief prayed for before the DRAT. 4. Leave as prayed for is granted. The petition is disposed of, as withdrawn, along with the pending applications.
HIMA KOHLI, J.
PRATIBHA RANI, J.
MARCH 23, 2018 ‘pg’
Page 2 of 2
W.P.(C) 3010/2018
Sonu Grover and another
Allahabad Bank
Hima Kohli
Pratibha Rani
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
