petitioner was running a trade of Banquet hall instead of 48 seats restaurant. It is a conceded position that health trade licence was issued to the petitioner on June 27, 2016. The petitioner has filed a petition on the premise that show-cause notice dated February 7, 2018 was issued to the petitioner for running the premises in unhygienic conditions. A response to the show cause notice was submitted by the petitioner. It is the submission of the Ld Counsel for the petitioner, the ground of cancellation is not for unhygienic conditions. The ground, that the petitioner is running a Banquet Hall, has never been communicated. On the other hand, it is contended by Mr. Jagdish Sagar, learned counsel for the respondents that notice dated December 1, 2017 was issued to the petitioner wherein it was brought to the notice of the petitioner, that it is using the premises as Banquet Hall contrary to the licence. He would also state a reply was also submitted by the petitioner to the show-cause notice dated December 1, 2017. A perusal of the writ petition would reveal, no reference to the show-cause notice December 1, 2017 and the reply submitted by the petitioner has been made. It is apparent that a very material fact has been concealed by the petitioner, which clearly shows the ground in the impugned order dated March 19, 2018 was the ground in the show-cause notice dated December 1, 2017. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed by imposing a cost of Rs.10,000/to be deposited by the petitioner with the Delhi High Court Legal Services Committee within three weeks.
