G S Sodhi v. NTPC Ltd. & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Order granting permission to petitioner to make representations to respondents regarding non-payment of post-retiral benefits and pension, directing a speaking order within ten weeks. Petition disposed of.
What did the court decide?
Permission granted to petitioner to make representations to both respondents within two weeks for subsequent adjudication.
What the court decided
- $~32
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- % Date of Order : March 22, 2018
- W.P.(C) 2797/2018 & CM Nos.11310-11/2018
G S SODHI ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Arun K.Sinha, Advocate versus NTPC LTD & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Adarsh Tripathi, Advocate
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR
O R D E R (ORAL)
- By way of this petition, a mandamus is sought to first respondent to pay post-retiral benefits including pension and commuted value of pension to petitioner as per ‘ Self-contributory Superannuation Benefits (Pension) Scheme, 1995 ’ with effect from 1st July, 2013 alongwith interest and also to pay adequate compensation to petitioner on account of non-payment of postretiral benefits to him from July, 2013.
- For the relief claimed in this petition, petitioner has not approached the respondents. Let petitioner do so by way of a representation. Mr.Arun K.Sinha, Advocate submits on behalf of petitioner that Representation has to be made to second respondent.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
G S Sodhi
- respondent
NTPC LTD
Coram
Sunil Gaur
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court