Disposed

T.P. Singh v. Director, Directorate of Education and Ors.

Delhi HC21 Mar 2018W.P.(C)/2723/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this common order disposing two identical petitions, the Delhi High Court directed the respondent-School to pass a speaking order on the petitioners' legal notice of September 4, 2017, treating it as a representation within six weeks, and convey its fate within a week thereafter.

What did the court decide?

Direction to respondent-School to pass speaking order on legal notice within six weeks and convey status within one week.

T.P. Singh Vs Director, Directorate of Education and… — Education and Admissions | Delhi HC (2018)

¶1

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶2

Date of Order: March 21, 2018

¶3

- W.P.(C) 2723/2018 + W.P.(C) 2733/2018

¶4

T.P. SINGH

¶5

PUNITA KAUR .....Petitioners

¶6

Through: Mr. Abhimanuyi Sharma and Ms. Deepali, Advocates

¶7

versus

¶8

DIRECTOR, DIRECTORATE OF EDUCATION AND ORS

¶9

.....Respondents Through: Mrs. Avnish Ahlawat, Mr. Nitish Singh and Ms. Palak Rohmetra, Advocates for respondent No.1 (in W.P.(C) 2723/2018) Mr. Sujeet K. Mishra, Advocate for respondent No.1 (in W.P.(C) 2733/2018)

¶10

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL GAUR

¶11

O R D E R (ORAL)

¶12

Petitioners in the above-captioned two petitions seek implementation of orders of 14^th February, 2013 and 18^th February, 2013 vide which respondent-School has been directed to implement 6^th Pay Commission’s Recommendations in terms of order of 11^th February, 2009 of respondent- Directorate of Education .

¶13

Since the subject matter in the above-captioned two petitions is identical, therefore, they are taken up for hearing together and by this common order, they are being disposed of.

¶14

Page 1 of 2

¶15

W.Ps.(C) 2723/2018 & 2733/2018

¶16

Learned counsel for petitioners submits that despite legal notice of 4^th September, 2017 sent on behalf of petitioner to respondents, there is no compliance of the orders of 14^th February, 2013 and 18^th February, 2013.

¶17

Despite service of advance notice, none appears on behalf respondent-School.

¶18

In the facts and circumstances of this case, it is deemed appropriate to dispose of these petitions with direction to respondents to pass a speaking order on petitioners’ Legal Notice of 4^th September, 2017 while treating it to be Representations, within a period of six weeks from today, if not already done, and its fate be conveyed to petitioners within a week thereafter, so that petitioners may avail of the remedies as available in law, if need be.

¶19

With aforesaid directions, these petitions are disposed of. Copy of this order be given dasti to counsel for petitioners.

¶20

(SUNIL GAUR) JUDGE

¶21

MARCH 21, 2018 s

¶22

Page 2 of 2

¶23

W.Ps.(C) 2723/2018 & 2733/2018

T.P. Singh v. Director, Directorate of Education and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

T.P. Singh v. Director, Directorate of Education and Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Raj Degree College Vs National Council for Teacher Education and Anr.

Milap Chand and Ors. Vs Union of India and Ors.

Daksh Bassi Vs Union of India and Ors.

Ashish Kumar Verma Vs Union of India and Ors.

Brij Kishore Sabharwal Vs Union of India and Anr.

Ravinder Gosain Vs Punjab & Sind Bank

Mr. Kshitiz Kumar Vs the Lt. Governor of Gnct and Ors.

Mohit Electronics Vs the Workman Tahir Hussain

Chaitanya Kumar Bhardwaj Vs Abhishek Singh and Ors. (New India Assurance Co. Ltd)

The New India Assurance Company Limited Vs Chaitanya Kumar Bhardwaj & Ors.

Yogendra Mittal Vs Union of India & Anr.

Rajesh Kumar Jha Vs Central Railside Warehouse Company Limited

Punita Kaur Vs Director of Education and Ors.

District and Sessions Courts Employees Welfare Association & Anr. Vs District & Sessions Judge (Headquarters) & Ors.