Petitioners sought permission to withdraw two writ petitions having due to having filed fresh petitions. The court disposed of the matters as withdrawn upon admission of the request.
Writ petitions dismissed as withdrawn by the court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~1 and 2
SONY MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS INDIA PVT. LTD. (NOW MERGED WITH SONY INDIA PVT. LTD.) ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Nageswar Rao, Mr. Sandeep S. Karhail and Mr. Parth, Advocates.
versus
ADD. COMM. OF INCOME TAX & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Sr. Standing Counsel for Revenue.
W.P.(C) 2631/2018 CM APPL 10802/2018
SONY INDIA PVT. LTD. ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Nageswar Rao, Mr. Sandeep S. Karhail and Mr. Parth, Advocates.
versus
ADD. COMM. OF INCOME TAX & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Ashok K. Manchanda, Sr. Standing Counsel for Revenue.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJIV KHANNA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDER SHEKHAR
O R D E R % 04.04.2018
Counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw these writ petition as the petitioners have preferred W.P.(C) Nos.3174/2018 and 3175/2018 which have been listed today and where interim orders have been passed.
Dismissed as withdrawn.
SANJIV KHANNA, J.
CHANDER SHEKHAR, J.
APRIL 04, 2018 MR/pk
Sony Mobile Communications India Pvt. Ltd.
Sony India Pvt. Ltd.
Addl. Commr. of Income Tax
Sanjiv Khanna
Chander Shekar
As recorded by the court registry
A petition under Article 226 of the Constitution asking a High Court to issue a writ against the State or a public authority in a civil matter.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
